U-Boat Prisoners at the Furnace

Whoever rules the waves rules the world.

--Alfred Thayer Mahan

U-595[1]

Isolated. Imprisoned. Afraid.

On Sunday, 6 December 1942, just one year removed from the Japanese attack at Pearl Harbor, 20-year-old German submariner Matrosengefreiter (Seaman, 2nd Class) Gerd Horn and 19-year-old Maschinengefreiter (Fireman, 3rd Class) Werner Rast were about to be questioned by U.S. Navy intelligence experts. They were separated from their shipmates and in prison cells over 4,000 miles from home in the heart of their enemy’s territory. Both sailors believed that these American interrogators were like those in Germany, in particular the Nazi Party’s Secret Police, the Gestapo, who would most certainly torture them to get the answers they needed. In their minds there could be only two approaches to dealing with their American captors: If either sailor refused to provide more than “his true name, rank, or else his [serial] number,”[2] he would risk bodily harm. If he collaborated with his enemy, cooperation with the Americans would mean being outcast, possibly even being murdered by their comrades, an act which did occur in prisoner of war (POW) camps in America during the war. How was it that these young, low-ranking German sailors found themselves facing such a predicament?

Only three weeks earlier, on 14 November, their vessel, the U-595, a 500-ton, Type VII-C unterseeboot (U-boat or submarine), was badly damaged on her third war patrol after a four-hour depth charge, bomb, and machine gun attack by seven British Lockheed Hudson aircraft.[3] The devastation to the vessel was so severe that it forced her captain, Kapitänleutnant Jürgen Quaet-Faslem, to run the boat aground and to order her scuttled off Cape Khamis, 70 miles northeast of Oran, Algeria. His actions destroyed the year-old boat but saved her entire complement of four officers and forty-one men, including Seaman Horn and Fireman Rast. After swimming ashore and surrendering to a U.S. Army Tank Corps unit (undeniably the first naval victory in the history of the Tank Corps), Horn, Rast, and forty-two shipmates were processed, preliminarily questioned, and quickly sent to America aboard the USAT Brazil (a cruise liner converted to an Army troop ship) where they arrived in Newport News, Virginia on 30 November. The last crew member who carried out the captain’s scuttling order was picked up by a British destroyer and transported to England for internment. Aboard Brazil, a preliminary U-595 crew screening was conducted, but more intense interrogation sessions by Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) Op-16-Z intelligence specialists began the next day at the Joint Interrogation Center (JIC), Fort Henry J. Hunt, Alexandria, Virginia eleven miles south of Washington, DC on the Potomac River. Ft. Hunt was also known by its unclassified name, P.O. Box 1142.

Three months earlier an agreement between the U.S. Provost Marshal General and British allies caused an initial 50,000 prisoners to be transferred to the U.S. to relieve Britain’s POW overcrowding problems. The U.S. then began a crash program of building, rehabilitation, and leasing of existing facilities. By the time U-595’s crew’s arrived at Ft. Hunt only 512 German POWs were interned in the Continental U.S., but within half a year, numbers of German POWs would surge to almost sixty-seven times to 34,161.[4]

After the traditional prisoner problems of housing, messing, and security, the most serious issue with German POWs was understanding the “intensity of the prisoners’ ideologies and so to segregate those prisoners whose attachment to Nazism was transitory and opportunistic from those whose beliefs were deep-seated and unalterable.”[5] Early attempts centered on separating POWs by nationality, rank, and armed service. But the most critical step in establishing and maintaining control in internment facilities was to isolate hard-core Nazis from anti-Nazis or ambivalent POWs. This meant interrogating prisoners to determine their political preferences.

Initially having space for only 60 POWs, Ft. Hunt quickly became overcrowded. As early as October 1942, the War Department recognized its need of a second east coast prisoner questioning site, and it selected Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) Camp S-51-PA near Pine Grove Furnace, Pennsylvania for conversion to a POW holding and interrogation facility, serving effectively as a daughter camp of the JIC at Ft. Hunt.[6] Although not scheduled for completion until 1 August 1943,[7] the War Department made Pine Grove Furnace POW Camp operational on 15 May 1943, anticipating the massive influx of prisoners transferred from British hands and additionally from those taken in Operation Torch, the Allied invasion of North Africa.[8] The Army also used a portion of the POW camp at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, which it called a “P/W Holding Enclosure,” as a temporary holding site for prisoners it transferred between Ft. Hunt, Pine Grove Furnace, and permanent internment camps around the nation. On 1 July 1943, seven months after their preliminary interrogation at Ft. Hunt, both Horn and Rast were transferred to the two-month-old Pine Grove Furnace POW Camp for interrogation, afterward to be returned to Ft. Hunt for additional questioning.[9]

Few people knew of the destruction of U-595 and the disposition of her crew. The U.S. War Department did not notify the International Red Cross of the status of the prisoners because informing them would signal the German Navy that their secret codes might be compromised. The War Department wanted it that way. In August 1942, CNO Admiral Ernest J. King had notified Chief of Staff of the Army General George C. Marshall that “for the effect on morale of enemy submarine crews that information of the taking of prisoners from U-boats be not available to the enemy governments for approximately three (3) months following the actual capture.”[10] Further, the United States would tell the Red Cross of the capture of prisoners only after they arrived at their permanent internment camps located around the country.

Command of the sea was key to winning the entire European campaign of the war. The Battle of the Atlantic, which lasted from September 1939 until May 1945, was the war’s longest continuous military campaign. During almost six years of naval warfare, German U-boats presented a formidable threat to Allied ships transporting military equipment, supplies, and troops across the Atlantic. The neutralization of the U-boat menace, which meant capturing men, boats, and equipment (particularly the top secret Enigma cipher machine and its code books) for their intelligence value, was critical to Allied success in sea control.[11]

From the war’s beginning until mid-1942, the Kriegsmarine (German Navy) enjoyed what its sailors called the “Happy Times” with few U-boat losses each month and pronounced success in sinking Allied tonnage. New construction of U-boats easily exceeded losses and officers and enlisted men of the submarine force gained valuable experience at sea. The Allies slowly turned the numbers around until by May 1943, U-boat losses were unsustainable; one quarter of the U-boat fleet was destroyed in that one month alone. The loss of U-595 occurred at the beginning of the “Sour Pickle Days,” a time which would see an increased sinking of U-boats. Losses accelerated until war’s end due to increases in the numbers of Allied war ships and their intelligence successes, tactics improvements, and technology advancements. Germany lost 765 U-boats and almost 27,000 submarine sailors (a 75 percent casualty rate) during its 69-month participation in WWII. There can be little wonder why U-boat survivors are seen smiling in pictures taken shortly after their capture; they were the fortunate few.

WWII U-boat Losses[13]

 

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

Jul

Aug

Sep

Oct

Nov

Dec

Total

1939

 

2

5

1

1

9

1940

2

5

3

4

1

1

2

2

1

1

2

0

24

1941

0

0

5

2

1

4

0

4

2

2

5

10

35

1942

3

2

7

2

4

3

12

9

10

16

13

5

86

1943

7

18

15

17

42

16

38

25

10

26

19

8

241

1944

14

22

24

21

23

24

23

32

20

9

7

15

234

1945

14

21

29

48

24

             

136

Total U-boats lost

765

When Horn and Rast first talked to interrogators at P.O. Box 1142, Navy intelligence men were on the lookout for fervent, controlling Nazis and for compliant, cooperative German prisoners, even low-ranking ones, who provided quick and accurate answers and whom they could turn into collaborators. Horn’s questioner was probably pleased to describe him as, “Good. Prompt answers. Can be persuaded.” Interestingly, after further interrogation, the Navy identified Horn as a Nazi. He listed Horn’s home as 9 Erlen Strasse, Barmen, Germany (35 km east of Dusseldorf) where he had lived with his parents and one sister.[14]

Rast appeared an equally good intelligence prospect whom his interrogator described as, “Definitely to be used. Hesitated only very slightly. Good possibility.” From 5 Feld Strasse, Raguhn (135 km southwest of Berlin), Rast’s waiting family consisted of father, mother, one brother, and two sisters.[15] A much more detailed 33-page report of the joint interrogation of the pair of young sailors over the period of 28 December 1942 - 3 January 1943 followed. Both Horn and Rast seemed cooperative and eager-to-please. And, without a doubt, terrified. The Navy gleaned important information from the pair: they revealed, for instance, that Germany had fitted active sonar countermeasures devices (he identified them as “pill throwers”) and radar detection and radar and sonar signature reduction (stealth) coatings on their U-boats in 1942.[16] Even though the information gleaned from these low-ranking sailors was most likely hearsay, it was important enough to the intelligence men to note it in their final reports. Neither Horn’s nor Rast’s capture had yet been reported to the Red Cross; this was true of all twenty-one of their U-595 shipmates, all enlisted men and one-half of the boat’s complement, who joined them at the new, secret POW facility in Cumberland County, Pennsylvania.[17]

U-595

Assembled Interrogations of: 1. UO-926/41S

2. UN-10845/41T

from Dec. 28, 1942 to Jan. 3, 1943

Q.

You told me yesterday about the pill thrower. What kind of a device is that?

     

2.

That is a tube which sticks out through the plating and is similar to a torpedo tube. It is 12 cm in diameter, and it has two pressure-proof lids, one on the inside and one on the outside. The ammunition looks the same as those beer cans about which we talked yesterday. Six of those pills are inserted into a tube.

 
 

Q.

What purpose do they serve?

 

___

   

1.

They destroy the rays. Now a destroyer can hear the propelling screw of the submarine when we stealthily approach our objective. These pills destroy the rays which pick up our sound.

 
     

Q.

Are they filled with chemicals?

   

1.

They are filled with some kind of a chemical substance, a brand new invention, of which nothing is known to us. Whenever they are ejected, no particle of any noise can penetrate.

 

Prisoners UO-926/41S (Gerd Horn) and UN-10842/41T (Werner Rast) talk about “pill throwers,” an apparent sound masking or noisemaker device used by U-boats to defeat Allied sonar. These interrogations were conducted at Fort Hunt by Navy intelligence officers from 28 December 1942 - 3 January 1943.[18]

Handwritten notes on secret Army documents referred to the Cumberland County camp simply as the Furnace, a designation used by some former Ft. Hunt intelligence personnel over sixty years later.[19] It was called by various other names and titles to keep its location and purpose classified, among them Carlisle, the 3300th Service Unit, the 3300th S.U., P.O. Box 167, Pine Grove Furnace, and McGoohan. Because the installation was covert and the camp was to be used for intelligence gathering, not merely housing POWs, the Adjutant General ordered that all correspondence pertaining to it be classified as, “Secret.”[20]

Horn and Rast were among prisoners whom the army shuttled in and out of the Furnace; new POWs arrived from and others left for Ft. Hunt or permanent internment camps around the nation, most often via Ft. Meade’s P/W Holding Enclosure. When Horn and Rast arrived at the Furnace, they were taken by an MP guard to the camp’s Intelligence Building, where Op-16-Z interrogators on temporary duty orders from Ft. Hunt questioned them to determine if they had “possibilities” and should be returned to Ft. Hunt for a more detailed interrogation. If they were judged to be “duds,” they would be transferred to one of the permanent, unclassified internment camps around the nation.[21] Prisoners stayed at the Furnace just long enough to be interrogated for intelligence value and evaluated for their political inclinations, which could take from a few days to a few months. This rapid turnover meant little chance for the POWs to organize an escape attempt or for them to control the camp. A best guess is that at least 7,300 prisoners passed through the Furnace during its thirty months of operation.[22]

During the Furnace’s existence, Op-16-Z officers questioned there no fewer than 141 sailors. Of those, a minimum of 78 were U-boat men from at least twelve, possibly fifteen vessels. U-595’s Horn and Rast were among the first U-boat sailors questioned. Men from a total of eight, perhaps nine boats were at the camp during the first eight months of 1944, signifying the Allies’ success that year in capturing submariners.

U-595 POWs Temporarily Held at Pine Grove Furnace[23]

Name

Rank/USN Equivalent

Internment Serial Number (ISN)

Screening Officer Comments

Selected for further screening?

PRZYGODE, Herman

Obermaschinist/Chief Petty Officer-Machinist

5G12NA

Unwilling. Tough nut. Notice verbatim answers.

No

SCHIERS, Hermann

Torpedo Mechanikermaat/Torpedo man’s Mate, 3rd Class

5G14NA

Very security conscious. Will talk about matters which do not concern U-boote. Fair. Quite conversational when not about work.

No

KARCHER, Anton

Matrosengefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G16NA

Tough. Polite but security conscious

No

KOHLER, August

Maschinegefreiter/Fireman, 3rd Class

5G17NA

Possibly well trained. Little stubborn. Not the worst.

No

HALM, Heinz Werner

Maschinegefreiter/Fireman, 3rd Class

5G18NA

Tough. No good to us.

No

SAUBERLICH, Henry Richard Bernhard

Matrosengefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G19NA

Tough. Very security conscious. Hopeless.

No

HORN, Gerd

Matrosengefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G24NA

Good. Prompt answers. Can be persuaded.

Yes

BUNGE, Franz Richard Martin

Funkobergefreiter/Seaman, 1st Class (Radioman)

5G27NA

Typical radioman. Nothing to be expected. In case of two bad Funke (radiomen) take this one because Obergefreiter.

No

OHRT, Claus

Maschinegefreiter/Fireman, 3rd Class

5G28NA

Doubt if knows much. Don't waste too much time on him.

No

RAST, Werner

Maschinegefreiter/Fireman, 3rd Class

5G29NA

Definitely to be used. Hesitated only very slightly. Good possibility.

Yes

SCHWARTZ, Gerog Max-Josef

Obersteurmann/Chief Petty Officer-Quartermaster

5G33NA

Very tough. Worthless.

No

DURST, Fritz Ernst Heinrich

Obermaschinemaat/Machinist’s Mate, 2nd Class

5G34NA

May have possibilities. Toss as to whether he would or might. Cool number.

No

HEDER, Herbert Paul

Maschinenmaat/Fireman, 1st Class

5G35NA

Not much good.

No

SCHMIEDER, Helmut Max

Matrosengefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G39NA

Country lad. A little bewildered.

No

GLUDING, Felix

Matrosengefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G40NA

Fair possibility for talking but would not know much.

No

JESPERS, Karl

Matrosengefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G41NA

Useless for our purposes.

No

GARTHE, Walter Ernst Heinrich

Matrosengefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G42NA

Useless.

No

BRANS, Bernhard, Fredrich Heinrich

Maschinegefreiter/Fireman, 3rd Class

5G45NA

Not much good. (Like Hell! T.H.)

No

DEGELMANN, Max Johann

Maschinegefreiter/Fireman, 3rd Class

5G46NA

Useless.

No

LEYKAUF, Andreas

Maschinegefreiter/Fireman, 3rd Class

5G47NA

No good.

No

ABELING, Karl Freidrich

Mechanikergefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G48NA

No good. Surly.

No

DRESSLER, Paul Gustav

Mechanikergefreiter/Seaman, 2nd Class

5G49NA

Very remote possibility. Will keep.

No

WAGNER, Fritz (Freidrich Wilhelm)

Matrose/Apprentice Seaman

5G51NA

Has Hitler youth belt on. No good to us.

No

U-118

On 12 June 1943, almost exactly seven months after U-595’s scuttling, the 1,600-ton combination minelayer and refuel/resupply submarine U-118 was attacked and sunk by four U.S. Navy Avenger torpedo bombers and four Wildcat escorting fighter aircraft based aboard U.S.S. Bogue, an escort aircraft carrier operating in the mid-Atlantic Ocean west of the Canary Islands. Fifty-eight officers, midshipmen, and enlisted men were onboard U-118 when the aircraft caught the U-boat on the surface in daylight under clear skies, calm seas, and 15-mile visibility. The Navy’s after action report described the boat’s destruction: “It is not surprising [that the submarine sank] after having been hit with sixteen 325 pound depth charges, 4,410 rounds of .50 caliber, and 800 rounds of .30 caliber ammunition. . . All officers on board were killed in the conning tower at the time of the attack, four dead were left in the water, and 17 men were picked up by the U.S.S. Osmon[d] Ingram. One man later died on board.”[24] The survivors were transported to Naval Operating Base, Norfolk where they arrived on 20 June 1943.

U-118 survivors had been preliminary interrogated aboard Osmond Ingram after they were fished from the sea and brought aboard. When they arrived in the U.S., the POWs were photographed, fingerprinted, medically examined, and sent to Ft. Hunt for a detailed interrogation. Because of the limited capacity of Ft. Hunt, some of these men were transferred to the Furnace to be interrogated and temporarily housed. The Army sent Oberfunkmaat Rudolf Wiemer, ISN 5G-56NA, a twenty-four-year-old Radioman First Class to the Furnace along with three of his U-118 shipmates--Bootsmaat (Coxswain) Hans Siebert, Oberbootsmaat (Third Class Petty Officer) Werner Reinl and Oberfunkmaat Josef Holler (or Hoeller). Radioman Wiemer, a prize catch whose duties aboard U-118 included the sending and receiving of radio traffic, decoding and encoding of radio messages on the Enigma machine, using the hydrophone (underwater listening) devices, detecting enemy radars, and using the boat’s own radar, proved to be very talkative during interrogation.

During questioning on 17 July 1943, Wiemer complained to his Pine Grove Furnace interrogators, “They now make 22 year old youngsters C. O.s [commanding officers], Lieutenants senior grade – no experience. Too bad . . . Kapitaenleutnant Mohr was drowned, a great fellow.”[27] Later, in speaking of a time in port in France, he related about his U-boat, “[We] were lucky . . . 3 nights of bomber attacks on [our base at] Lorient . . . we didn’t get into the [submarine] pen . . . our 1,600-ton boat was too big.”[28] Wiemer referred to a mid-January 1943 Royal Air Force air raid against Lorient in which U-118 received minor damage.[29]

Five days later, POW Hans Siebert told interrogators, “You can remember what they told us: ‘If we can sink as many boats as they build, we will win the war.’ And we shall manage it, too.” Interrogated at the same time, his shipmate, prisoner Werner Reinl fearfully stated, “Many men from the navy are being used in Russia.”[30] Playing on the German prisoners’ fear of fighting on the Russian front was an effective tactic used by U.S. interrogators to loosen POWs’ tongues.[31]

Endings

From September 1944 until war’s end, records show only three U-boat men at Pine Grove Furnace. Internment Serial Numbers (ISNs) on prisoner transfer orders began to identify predominately German army prisoners taken in Europe, indicating a shift to interrogating POWs from the Allied invasion of that continent at Normandy.[32] When U-boat sailors Horn, Rast, and Wiemer were finally transferred to their internment camps, Washington notified the Red Cross of their capture and location. Their status would now be known by both their anxious families and the German government, and the men could now receive letters and packages from home. It would be a matter of years, though, until these sailors again saw their loved ones.

U-595 Seaman Gerd Horn, a Nazi who initially seemed cooperative and collaborative, was interned at the Stringtown, Oklahoma POW camp, a War Department-leased Oklahoma state prison. Stringtown was primarily an internment camp for German army POWs; that a U-boat sailor would be sent there is curious. Perhaps his Nazi identification led to Horn’s transfer to Stringtown.

On 18 December 1943, the Provost Marshal General ordered U-595 Fireman Werner Rast to the POW facility at Camp Blanding, Florida. Camp Blanding was designated the permanent internment camp for anti-Nazi naval prisoners. In November 1944, the Army transferred all naval POWs at Camp Blanding to Papago Park, AZ, an internment camp for naval POWs, the majority of whom were submariners.[33]

It is not known when or where U-118 Radioman Rudolf Wiemer went after leaving the Furnace. But because he was part of a U-boat crew, we can speculate that he spent time at Papago Park with other submarine sailors and officers. He was repatriated to Germany sometime after war’s end and visited with his U-118 shipmates and fellow POWs Herman Wiedemann and Werner Reinl in 1956.[34]

With the war in Europe over, German POWs were repatriated, and the Furnace’s wartime mission was completed. It closed on 2 November 1945.[36] Over eight months later at 3 P.M. on 22 July 1946, the last American-held German POWs were officially released and sailed from Camp Shanks, NY for home aboard the harbor boat General Yates; the internment of foreign prisoners of war on U.S. soil ended.[37]

Reading these sailors’ stories reminds us that the men fighting the war were young, as they always are. They were real people, often from loving families, who had pre- and post-war lives. Reading interrogation reports written by the intelligence officers questioning them, who were about the same age as their prisoners, reveals an impressive set of strategies which had to be rapidly developed to gather information from the POWs.

The August 1942 War Department agreement with the British to accept 50,000 of their POWs had been the watershed moment which galvanized a largely unprepared military intelligence establishment into action. That pact spurred the U.S. War Department to create a system for interrogating, imprisoning, moving, and controlling hundreds of thousands of enemy prisoners. The original transfer orders, transfer requests, and interrogation reports, many of which exist only on flimsy green carbon-paper copies rubber stamped with red security classification markings and occasionally hand written notes, documents a slow start mushrooming into a monumental work. As the intelligence effort grew, Pine Grove Furnace’s part in the process matured from its original design as a simple holding facility for Ft. Hunt to an active interrogation site and Nazi screening location.

References (Sources Available at CCHS in bold)

[1]Some of the information for this article is taken from my book on the same subject; see John Paul Bland, Secret War at Home: The Pine Grove Furnace Prisoner of War Interrogation Camp (Carlisle, PA: Cumberland County Historical Society, 2006). Permission for the use of this material has been graciously granted by the Cumberland County Historical Society (CCHS).

[2]Convention signed at Geneva, Convention of July 27, 1929, Article 5, Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War.

[3]Available from https://www.uboatarchive.net/U-595A/U-595.htm accessed 11 August 2016.

[4]ASF WD Monthly Progress Reports, Sec. 11, Administration. Copy in Arnold Krammer, Nazi Prisoners of War in America (Lanham, MD: Scarborough House, 1996), 271. When Germany surrendered to the Allies in May 1945, 371,683 German prisoners were held in the U.S.

[5]Krammer, Nazi Prisoners of War in America, 13. 

[6]PMGO, letter SPMGA (19) 254 to Requirements Division, Services of Supply (SOS), WD, dated 26 November 1942, Subject: Internment Facilities for Prisoners of War, Box 1395, RG 389, NARA. 

[7]Lieutenant Colonel Victor H. Meseke, “Completion Report, TC-10 Directive, Pine Grove Furnace Internment Camp,” dated 1943, 1, Box 77, RG 77, NARA. This latter reference was the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ final report of the conversion of the existing CCC facility of Company 329, Camp S-51-PA, into the Pine Grove Furnace POW Camp. 

[8]ASF, PMGO memo SPMGA (19) 254, dated 30 April 1943 for the Chief of Administrative Services.

[9]Headquarters, 1343rd SU letter SD/pd over 253.91, Fort George G. Meade, Md. dated 15 July 1943 to the Director of War Division, Office of the Provost Marshal General, War Department, Washington, D.C., Box 1377, RG 1378, NARA.

[10]CNO letter FFI/A16-2 over Serial 01962 dated Aug 26, 1942.

[11]The Allies obtained three Enigma cipher machines and code books from captured U-boats; U-110 on 9 May 1941, U-559 on 30 October 1942, and U-505 on 4 June 1944. Available from http://uboat.net/boats accessed 15 September 2016.

[12]Available from https://www.uboatarchive.net/U-595A/U-595.htmU-595.htm accessed 18 August 2016.

[13]Available from http://uboat.net/fates/losses/chart.htm accessed 9 September 2016.

[14]“Questionnaire” of Horn, Gerd, ISN 5G-24NA, available from http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-595A/U-595ScreenHorn.htm; Internet, accessed 30 May 2016.

[15]“Questionnaire” of Rast, Werner, ISN 5G-29NA, available from http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-595A/U-595ScreenHorn.htm; Internet, accessed 30 May 2016.

[16]Joint Interrogation Center at Fort Hunt, Virginia, Assembled Interrogations of Matrosengefreiter Gerd Horn and Maschinengefreiter Werner Rast, (28 December 1942 to 3 January 1943), available from http://https://www.uboatarchive.net/U-595A/U-595.htmU-595.htm; Internet, accessed 30 May 2016.

[17]The CCHS has a database of over 7300 POW names obtained from official War Department requests for prisoner transfer obtained from the National Archives and Record Administration II, College Park, MD. 

[18]JIC, Ft. Hunt, Assembled Interrogations of Matrosengefreiter Gerd Horn and Maschinengefreiter Werner Rast, (28 December 1942 to 3 January 1943), 22-23.

[19]Bill Hess, interview by author, 27 March 2007, McLean, VA, written notes, author. Mr. Hess was an Army interrogator/translator stationed at Ft. Hunt whom the Army sent to Pine Grove Furnace on temporary duty to interrogate German POWs.

[20]AG, letter 320.2 OB-I-SPOMU-M (5-11-43) to PMGO, dated 13 May 1943. 

[21]Hess, interview.

[22]CCHS database of POW names.

[23]Available from http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-595A/U-595Screening.htm; Internet, accessed 30 May 2016.

[24]VC-9, Report #9 dated12 June 1943, Report of Antisubmarine Action by Aircraft, available from http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-118A/U-118VC9ASW6_19_43.htm; Internet, accessed 29 August 2016. 

[25]Available from http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-118A/U-118.htm; Internet, accessed 3 September 2016.

[26]Available from http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-118A/U-118POWs.htm; Internet, accessed 3 September 2016.

[27]ASF, Third SerCom, P.O. Box 167, Carlisle, PA, Extract of Information Received No. 73, dated 17 July 1943, Box 368, RG 165, NARA. The “Kapitaenleutnant Mohr” mentioned by Wiemer was probably Johann Mohr, commander of the U-124, which the Allies sunk 4 April 1943, two months before U-118. Mohr commanded U-124 on six of her eleven war patrols, sank thirty-two vessels, and won the Knight’s Cross twice. U-124 and U-118 were assigned to Lorient during the same months in 1942, and Wiemer probably knew of the German U-boat hero from that time. See Herbertus Weggelaar and Horst Schmeisser, “Crew Lists for WW2” (N.d.; available from https://historisches-marinearchiv.de/projekte/crewlisten/ww2/eingabe.php... Internet, accessed 21 March 2024).

[28]ASF, Third SerCom, P.O. Box 167, Carlisle, PA, Extract of Information Received No. 80, dated 17 July 1943, Box 368, RG 165, NARA.

[29]Navy Department, CNO (Op-16-Z) O.N.I. 250-G/Serial 15, “Report on the Interrogation of Survivors from U-118 Sunk on 12 June 1943,” dated 26 August 1943, 28 (26 August 1943; available from http://www.uboatarchive.net; Internet, accessed 12 May 2006).

[30]ASF, Third SerCom, P.O. Box 167, Carlisle, PA, Information Received No. 87, dated 22 July 1943, Box 368, RG 165, NARA.

[31]Hess, interview.

[32]The total number of naval prisoners questioned at Pine Grove Furnace POW Camp was obtained by counting those identified as such on POW transfer requests from the 3300th SU. These were contained in Boxes 1377-79, RG 389, NARA. That collection of names was crosschecked with names of submarine sailors and their boats identified on a database website. See Herbertus Weggelaar and Horst Schmeisser. “Crew Lists for WW2” (N.d.; available from https://historisches-marinearchiv.de/projekte/crewlisten/ww2/eingabe.php... Internet, accessed 21 March 2024). The difference in the German and English spelling of sailors’ last names is critical, and it accounts for the discrepancy in the number of positively identified U-boats and their crews. In one case, four U-118 men were identified from an interrogation report generated at the camp. See ASF, Third SerCom, P.O. Box 167, Carlisle, PA, Extract of Report of Interrogation No. 144, dated 28 July 1943. Box 368, RG 165, NARA.

[33]Bill Bond, “Ex-pow Recalls Life In American Camp,” Orlando (Florida) Sentinel, 12 October 1986. 

[34]Tracking exactly who was transferred, when it happened, and the political leanings of POWs is difficult. While prisoner transfer orders which detail POW location, movements, and politics are contained in files of the National Archives and Records Administration II (NARA), College Park, MD, these papers are myriad. Because no electronic, searchable database of all prisoners exists, the research process can be tedious and often ends in a dead-end. CCHS’s POW database contains about 7,300 names of prisoners who went through the Furnace. Internet sources like http://uboat.net and its sister site, http://www.uboatarchive.net, are valuable resources. Any scholar interested in studying this subject is encouraged to do so.

[35]Available from http://www.uboatarchive.net/U-118A/U-118Photos.htm; Internet, accessed 3 September 2016.

[36]ASF, Third SerCom, P.O. Box 167, Carlisle, Pa., Special Orders Number 29, dated 2 November 1945, CCHS.

[37]“Camp Shanks Ends War Mission As Last German PW’s Start Home,” New York Times, 23 July 1946.

Journal Issue:

Author:

This article covers the following places:

Similar Journal Article

A First Sergeant's Memories of Camp Michaux: The Lost Collection of The Pine Grove Furnace Prisoner of War Camp

I have never forgotten my first solitary walk through Camp Michaux. The sun was setting and visitors had gone. I explored in silence, hearing only a gentle breeze create an eerie creaking in the trees that made me strain my ear as if listening for voices of the past.

Related Entry